Mozumdar, Chandana, “Swastika and tiranga:
Subhas Bose and Indian nationalism's connection with the Third Reich”, PhD
thesis, Auburn University, 1999. Brief summary.
“In the immediate postwar period the enthusiasm
to use India as a pawn against Britain, as Germany had done during World War I,
was replaced by a determination to preserve German commercial interests in
India…. In 1933 a dualism developed in Berlin's
attitude toward India
and its quest for independence. The German diplomats had to now carry out the
delicate balancing between Hitler's open contempt for the notion of an
independent India and the economic and strategic value that India had for a
Germany struggling to regain its position as a world power. The present study
attempts to trace this dualism in Germany's diplomatic approach to
Indian nationalism, and contends that it was the fundamental cause for the
course of events involving Indian nationalists and the Third Reich during the
Second World War. The early years of the Reich's relations between Indians and
the National Socialists were marred by numerous incidents of racial discord,
which caused considerable problems for German diplomats in India. They repeatedly cautioned
against such outbreaks in order to prevent an economic backlash against Germany.
The Indians, for their part, reveling in their position as consumers of German
goods, never hesitated to use the threat of boycott as a leverage against Berlin. The epitome of
the German dualistic attitude toward Indian nationalism is the case of Subhas
Chandra Bose. Aggravated by Gandhi's inflexible attitude toward his methods,
convinced that the British could only be ousted from India through military
means, and convinced as were that, despite Hitler's opposition to the concept
of Indians having the right of self-determination, he would not fail to
recognize the value of Indian nationalists in his camp, Bose sought assistance
from the Axis after the outbreak of the Second World War. Bose's cause was
encouraged by German diplomats who posted in distant outposts like Kabul had an exaggerated
idea of their own importance and that of their clients. In their defense one
must point out that by the standards of international intrigue, they did
recognize that Bose would be an excellent pawn in the game of 'your enemy's
enemy is your friend.' Hitler himself, despite his unwillingness to accept the
notion of an India free of British domination, saw Bose's propaganda value….
(W)hile Bose certainly failed in getting Hitler to publicly announce his
sympathy for India's cause,
the facts that he was maintained in Germany as a legitimate foreign
leader, given permission to conduct propaganda, and allowed to create an Indian
legion, served both Bose and Hitler. Bose's presence in Germany kept alive the fear in the Allied camp
of the possibility of an Axis assisted attack on India with Bose's collaboration.
Bose's mistake was in expecting more than it was possible for Hitler to provide
and his misunderstanding of the depth prejudices.” From the abstract.